On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 12:02:31PM +0000, Silvia Hagen wrote:
So let's go for balance :-)
I agree. I think a sensible balance may be that allocations >/29
are reviewed (as they are now, AIUI) by the IPRA managers and/or
the Board.
There is a danger, in my opinion, that the IPv6
allocation/assignment process is infested with "IPv4 thinking"
which will result in SPs employing "workarounds" of the sort that
made IPv4 such a pain to deal with.
That said, I've done a bit of v6 IPAM recently and the numbers
one deals with are staggering. ;p
rgds,
Sascha Luck
