+1 for Carsten's opinion I also prefer this mailing-list for AP discussions.
Regards, Carsten Brückner -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: address-policy-wg [mailto:[email protected]] Im Auftrag von Carsten Schiefner Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. August 2015 14:45 An: Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) Cc: [email protected] Working Group Betreff: Re: [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC Daniel, all - On 12.08.2015 14:16, Daniel Baeza (Red y Sistemas TVT) wrote: > Yesterday, I've started a discussion in the member list about > promoting the use of IRC instead of Mail List for some kind of > discussions, chit chat, etc. > > Not much members answered, but all who did said yes. > > The goal is to have, at least, one channel per mail list, but not > limited to only that. > > For this list, an #address-policy channel will be created and > administrated by the WG Chairs. > > We want to use the actual RIPE IRC Server plus Network Services and > some more irc servers linked to the Ripe one. > > What do you think? I would not go so far and call this a bad idea - but I am not at all easy about it either. Random (sub) groupings of whatever kind can and should most certainly be free to use whatever means of communication they see fit - but address policy stuff must IMHO stay on this mailing list. And only there! I for sure will not open yet another ingress channel I then would need to monitor. Cheers, -C.
