Hello, > random sub-groups sitting together in a smoke-filled room, one or two or the > other IRC channels, and throwing around ideas before bringing up something > formal is a good thing - as long as it's clearly understood that this is > informal.
+1 While no one wants this to snowball into multiple chat channels impossible to keep abreast of, I also think it's good to have a forum for informal chat. But I would urge minimalizing, say one sub-channel per WG. Regards, James -----Original Message----- From: address-policy-wg [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Gert Doering Sent: 12 August 2015 15:46 To: Carsten Schiefner Cc: [email protected] Working Group Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] Promote the use of IRC Hi, On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 02:44:30PM +0200, Carsten Schiefner wrote: > Random (sub) groupings of whatever kind can and should most certainly > be free to use whatever means of communication they see fit - but > address policy stuff must IMHO stay on this mailing list. And only there! Emphasis on "what is not on this list has not happened" as far as formal(!) policy-making goes. OTOH, random sub-groups sitting together in a smoke-filled room, one or two or the other IRC channels, and throwing around ideas before bringing up something formal is a good thing - as long as it's clearly understood that this is informal. Gert Doering -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
