Of course, if you accept 2015-01 to prevent depletion and then 2015-05. 2015-10-20 18:00 GMT+03:00 "Tomasz Śląski @ KEBAB" <[email protected]>: > W dniu 2015-10-20 o 16:56, Aleksey Bulgakov pisze: >> >> Dear, all. >> >> I think it will be rightly to make progressive allocating depend on >> current resource number and age of the LIR. >> >> E.g. >> LIR has /16 - he can ask /16 or equivalent >> Or >> First 18 months - /22, second 18 months months - /21, third 18 months - >> /20 etc. >> >> I think it will supplement 2015-01 very good. >> > > Do you think, that the remaining space from last /8 is made of rubber? > > -- > Tomasz Śląski > pl.skonet
-- ---------- Best regards, Aleksey Bulgakov Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29
