I am against this proposal - with no particular hat on. (it reads like "we know we run out - so lets give it more speed so we run out faster"....)
Wolfgang > On 20.10.2015, at 16:53, Sleigh, Robert <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I think this is a very bad idea*. The whole reason the final /8 policy looks >> the way it does (and is as far as I can see working *exactly* as intended) >> is so late entrants to this Internet game have a fair chance of establishing >> themselves without having to resort to commercial alternatives for IPv4 >> address space.
