Le 29/10/2015 15:29, Daniel Suchy a écrit : > Hello, > connection tracking in CGN environments isn't a issue (just poor network > design, if you don't have such data). For example, mobile networks are > using NAT in wide spread and they haven't such problems you're > mentioning. It's not hard to pair flow data from private and public part > of your network to get proper output. There're also commercial tools on > the marked cappable doing that job.
ipv6 sucks. we need ipv4 ASN based end to end routing. bst regards. > > The only one real solution is move to IPv6. Everything else is just a > workaround for a short period. And as we cannot kill IPv4, for long > period we'll need both protocols - and also new organizations should > have possibility to start their business and get *some* adresses - as > long as possible. > > Conservative RIPE policy helps in that manner. Everything else is just > attempt to pillage in short-term... > > With regards, > Daniel > > > On 29.10.2015 14:01, Alessio Genova wrote: >> Hello, >> >> we are working as Wireless Internet Service Provider in Italy, and we >> became a LIR at the beginning of 2013, requesting a /22. >> >> From 2013 to today our customers have grown up to more than 5000. Today >> every time Policy requests us a log about some fraudulent behavior made >> from one of our customer by internet, we have to give them a lot of logs >> (Gbytes of logs) because of we cannot associate public IP addresses to >> every our customer. >> >> >> >> There are a lot of public IP addresses not used, and we are receiving a >> lot of proposals about selling IPs at 10€ / each . >> >> I think that RIPE should verify who really is using public IPs, or >> should introduce a way to avoid IPs market, giving IPs at who really >> needs them. >> >> >> >> Best Regards >>
