* Gert Doering <[email protected]>

> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 05:59:44PM +0000, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > On 29/10/2015 14:38, Gert Doering wrote:
> > > Call to order.  Wishing for non-existant technologies to overcome
> > > IPv4 shortage is totally off-topic here.
> > 
> > Can I also humbly suggest adding "let's make the RIPE NCC take
> > existing IPv4 allocations away from someone else (and give them to
> > me)" to this list?
> 
> Technically, this would be a matter for this working group (coming up
> with a reclaim policy for unused allocations) - but that would have
> to be a separate proposal.

Might we instead inist that the «let's make the RIPE NCC take existing
IPv4 allocations away from someone else (and give them to me)» crowd
actually submits a formal policy proposal to that effect?

If it turns out they're unwilling to do so, we could call them to order
due to the purpose of this list isn't to be a wailing wall for people
to vent about wanting more IPv4 addresses.

If on the other hand a proposal does get submitted, we could discuss
it on its merits. (After the proposal has gone the way I believe it
would, it would be appropriate to reconsider Nick's suggestion.)

Tore

Reply via email to