On 10/29/2015 04:09 PM, Alessio Genova wrote:
>It cannot be reiterated enough: The final /22 is a migration tool for IPv6. There
is a large number of viable >solutions to use IPv6 as your main
addressing scheme for a eyeball ISP, especially if you have started
from >scratch only a few years ago.
>
>Instead of screaming for more regulation on a market that more or less works, I
think that focusing on IPv6 >adoption should be the first order of
business.
>
>Regards,
>
>--ck
Who writes some sentence, surely knows that today IPv6 addressing in
Italy is used only by Facebook, Google, Youtube and some other else,
but most of sites are only reachable by IPv4.
So, please, let me know how to migrate all our customers to IPv6
giving them access to the whole internet, as today, and we’ll make it.
Vice versa I’m sure that RIPE should verify who really is using public
IPs, or should introduce a way to avoid IPs market, giving IPs at who
really needs them.
If some entity has more resources than needed, the entity is free to
donate or sell those resources. If your problem is that you don't have
enough IP addresses, explore the options and pick one.
Changing the policy in order to take away resources from someone else
sounds like what communists did decades ago in certain countries, by
taking from the "rich" and giving to the "poor".
In short, your problem is you don't have enough IPv4. There is IPv4
available on the free market. Go buy some. Problem solved.
