On 29.10.2015 15:09, Alessio Genova wrote: > Vice versa I’m sure that RIPE should verify who really is using public > IPs, or should introduce a way to avoid IPs market, giving IPs at who > really needs them.
In case of stopping of CGN/NAT usage in incumbent's networks (which're holding large allocations), they *WILL* need them like you. Everyone needs them, but IPv4 address space is exhausted - that's reality and these days you *must* deploy NAT for end-users. I don't see any way of *avoiding* IP market. There will be always some ways to bypass policy. In worst case we'll have inaccurate registry as consequence of strict regulations avoiding transfers etc. This approach never worked. With regards, Daniel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
