Hi. I think there is 2015-01 and it is enough to prevent reselling for undistributed 185./8 and others proposals make more problems for all - members, RIPE stuff, member's customers. E.g. is multiple accoutns when executive board suspend it and then asked to vote to allow it again. The IPs aren't burn (it is not oil or gas) even some one sell it. Simply the owner is some LIR but not the NCC. May be it will increase the price, no more. But the NCC wants to have exclusive rights to sell it (but RIPE is not organisation to make profit or I am wrong? :) ) and creates new proposals.
2016-06-20 11:42 GMT+03:00 Gert Doering <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 11:39:30PM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote: >> > THERE. IS. NO. IPv4. LEFT! >> >> And is that the reason policy is trying to return only smallest allocations >> and let the big allocation holders continue selling their ones? > > This policy is not about "return allocations", but about reducing the > burn rate by reserving /22s for those who actually want to run a network > with it, instead of trade away quickly for a short gain. > > Gert Doering > -- APWG chair > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- ---------- Best regards, Aleksey Bulgakov Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29
