Trading is restricted by 2015-01. Don't you see it? Open the transfer statistics and look it. But WG find the problem where is not a problem.
2016-06-20 12:16 GMT+03:00 Gert Doering <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:56:47PM +1000, Arash Naderpour wrote: >> > This policy is not about "return allocations", but about reducing the >> > burn rate by reserving /22s for those who actually want to run a network >> > with it, instead of trade away quickly for a short gain. >> >> When an allocation is not transferable to another member, one day they need >> to be returned to RIPE NCC. > > Yes. But that's a side effect of not allowing transfers of these /22s. > > Basically, the discussion *should* try to focus on this point, and not > run around the mill with non-sensical arguments. > > - do we want to restrict trading of "last /8 policy" /22s, yes or no? > > If we want restrictions, then this will have consequences (like, if you > close your LIR and are not selling off the whole business, the /22 will > be returned). > > If we want *no* restrictions, this will also have consequences - namely, > some (few) people making money based on resources other folks have set > aside to be there for the long-term good of the RIPE region, which many > others see as immoral and abusive. > > But do not complain about the potential consequences, please just answer > the question. > > Gert Doering > -- NetMaster > -- > have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? > > SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard > Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann > D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) > Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 -- ---------- Best regards, Aleksey Bulgakov Tel.: +7 (926)690-87-29
