Strong support in principle. We have been denied IPv6 temporary assignments due to the NCC's interpretation that a single DHCP lease on wifi is a "subassignment" to another entity, which was clearly not the intention.
I note that the "New policy text" does not specify the replacement text for the "Contractual Requirements" Regards, David On 21 October 2016 at 10:15, Marco Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > A new RIPE Policy proposal 2016-04, "IPv6 PI Sub-assignment Clarification" > is now available for discussion. > > The goal of this proposal is to define sub-assignments in IPv6 PI assignments > as subnets of /64 and shorter. > > You can find the full proposal at: > > https://www.ripe.net/participate/policies/proposals/2016-04 > > We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to > <[email protected]> before 21 November 2016. > > Regards, > > Marco Schmidt > Policy Development Officer > RIPE NCC > > Sent via RIPE Forum -- https://www.ripe.net/participate/mail/forum > > -- David Croft For support enquiries please always contact support at sargasso.net and not any named individual. UK: 0845 034 5020 USA: 212-400-1694 Sargasso Networks Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No. 06404839. Registered Office: 46a Albert Road North, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 9EL http://www.sargasso.net/
