On 21 October 2016 at 12:55, Maximilian Wilhelm <[email protected]> wrote: > Anno domini 2016 David Croft scripsit: >> I note that the "New policy text" does not specify the replacement >> text for the "Contractual Requirements" > > That doesn't seem neccessary as the point in question - the definiton > of a sub-assignment - is specified in the new version of ripe-655. > > What are you missing?
It appears in the "Current policy text" section, which implied that it was going to be changed in the "New policy text" section, but I guess it's just there for context then. David -- David Croft For support enquiries please always contact support at sargasso.net and not any named individual. UK: 0845 034 5020 USA: 212-400-1694 Sargasso Networks Ltd. Registered in England and Wales No. 06404839. Registered Office: 46a Albert Road North, Reigate, Surrey, RH2 9EL http://www.sargasso.net/
