Hi, On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 11:20:34AM +0100, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote: > Ok, here is it then. Hopefully we have a lot of fun and good noise ;-) > (that's music?)
Thanks.
So, basically, we have two possible approaches here:
proposed by Max (active proposal):
keep the IPv6 PI policy as somewhat restrictive, trying to find wording
that permits "some generally accepted" use-cases where other people's
devices can get numbers from someone's IPv6 PI block
or,
proposed by Jordi (new direction):
completely remove the restrictions on "letting other people use parts
of someone's IPv6 PI block"
both would work to solve the (real) problem at hand, and Jordi's approach
would certainly much easier than trying to come up with unambiguous wording
to "permit some, disallow other" use cases.
Thanks for your proposal, and now let's see what the community wants :-)
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
