Sascha Luck [ml] wrote: [...]
> I think it would actually simplify a lot of those issues. > It doesn't remove the RIR->LIR->End User hierarchy > but it removes the requirement that a LIR provide > connectivity to an End User. Since when has this been a requirement? Section 2.4 of ripe-699 defines LIRs and describes them as "primarily" providing addresses for network services that they provide. Have I misunderstood the policy, or is there currently a requirement that LIR provide network connectivity to the users of the addresses they assign or sub-allocate? Kind regards, Leo Vegoda
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
