Hi, On Tue, Jul 16, 2019 at 10:29:28AM +0200, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote: > Again, please consider, if it is good that we are the only RIR not doing so. > I don't think that's good.
If this is the main argument ("I changed this in all the other RIRs,
and now *you* are the only ones stubbornly refusing to follow my
all-the-others-are-doing-this argument") - it's a somewhat weak one.
You have failed to bring forward any reason for changing things, except
"it is unfair that there is a difference"
(without detailing what exactly the unfairness would be, who would
be disadvantaged by this, exactly, and why they would be affected
positively by this proposal) - and
"all the other RIRs have changed this!"
which is both not very compelling.
I could also not see anyone speak up in a supportive way, so I'd consider
this "sufficiently discussed, and no support to go for a formal proposal".
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
