> On 16 Jul 2019, at 09:46, Gert Doering <[email protected]> wrote: > > I could also not see anyone speak up in a supportive way, so I'd consider > this "sufficiently discussed, and no support to go for a formal proposal". I agree. Let's close this discussion and move on to the next Bad Idea.
- Re: [address-polic... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-polic... Nick Hilliard
- Re: [address-polic... Mike Burns
- Re: [address-polic... Gert Doering
- Re: [address-polic... Mike Burns
- Re: [address-polic... Gert Doering
- Re: [address-polic... Mike Burns
- Re: [address-policy-wg... Havard Eidnes via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-polic... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-polic... Gert Doering
- Re: [address-polic... Jim Reid
- Re: [address-polic... Michiel Klaver via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-polic... Carlos Friaças via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-polic... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-polic... Mike Burns
- Re: [address-polic... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-polic... Scott Leibrand
- Re: [address-polic... Kai 'wusel' Siering
- Re: [address-polic... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
- Re: [address-policy-wg] questio... Erik Bais
- Re: [address-policy-wg] qu... JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg
