> On 22 Jul 2019, at 14:26, Piotr Strzyzewski via address-policy-wg 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> IMHO, this is not the case here. Let's try not to fall in the false dilemma 
> here.

I'm sorry Piotr, I strongly disagree. The idea that was being proposed imposes 
retroactive conditions on legacy address holders. Which is very wrong. Policies 
should never be imposed retroactively.

If implemented, the suggested policy will discourage legacy holders from 
co-operating with the NCC, Which in turn encourages "creative" solutions to get 
around that hypothetical problem and therefore bring about new ways to 
undermine the integrity of the NCC database.

I fail to see what the false dichotomy is. Or could be.



Reply via email to