On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, at 07:37, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > I guess that I will have to speak to my friends in the DB working group > about that, because there is *no* indication of this whatsoever in > either the current -or- the historical records for the 62.222.0.0/15 > block, specifically.
Probably a less specific.... When a less specific is splitted for transfer, the transferred chunk (didn't check for the remaining ones, but I suppose it's the same), has the "created date" of the transfer, but the date in the netname retains the date of the initial allocation. -- Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN
