In message <[email protected]>, "Radu-Adrian FEURDEAN" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 9, 2019, at 07:37, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: >> I guess that I will have to speak to my friends in the DB working group >> about that, because there is *no* indication of this whatsoever in >> either the current -or- the historical records for the 62.222.0.0/15 >> block, specifically. > >Probably a less specific.... >When a less specific is splitted for transfer... Sorry. You lost me. I thought that we were discussing something that had been -aggregated-, not split. Did I misunderstand? Regards, rfg
