Hi Jordi, > Otherwise, do you have other suggestions, or do you think the we should > ignore the stockpiling?
A 'stockpiling' on the obsoleted resource is a result of semi-free market. Just let the IPv4 go, and market and technology will do the rest. And yes, I am the market player. -- Kind regards, Sergey Myasoedov > On 28 Oct 2020, at 13:13, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > Could you explain why not? > > Clearly it is something that should part of the NCC verification duties, but > we have been told several times, in other policy proposals, that we need to > make it explicit so they can "act". > > Otherwise, do you have other suggestions, or do you think the we should > ignore the stockpiling? > > Regards, > Jordi > @jordipalet > > > > El 28/10/20 13:09, "address-policy-wg en nombre de Nick Hilliard" > <[email protected] en nombre de [email protected]> escribió: > > JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via address-policy-wg wrote on 28/10/2020 12:05: >> However, in RIPE NCC, if you created several LIRs for getting more >> IPv4 allocations, *even if you don't use/need it* you can get (and >> thus stockpile) IPv6 *at no extra cost*. > [...] >> Do we need some text about "recovery if not announced and used" ? > > tl;dr: no. > > Nick > > > > > ********************************************** > IPv4 is over > Are you ready for the new Internet ? > http://www.theipv6company.com > The IPv6 Company > > This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or > confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the > individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, > copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if > partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be > considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware > that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this > information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly > prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the > original sender to inform about this communication and delete it. > > > > >
