James Kennedy wrote:
An intentionally small group of community members - in order to be agile,
work efficiently, and avoid too many cooks, etc. - have already started
work on the IPv6 policy review.
Agile!!! Yeah! Very reasonable goal.
So, if we can't see full IPv6 deployment within a certain period of
time, obviously less than a year, or, at most, 3 years, we must conclude
that IPv6 inoperational.
Or, are you saying that just reviewing the current policy situation
requires several years of *agile* reviewing period, after which
several tens of years will be wasted to modify current policy
only after, in the real world, IPv6 will be fully abandoned?
Then, I'm afraid RIPE is hopeless.
Masataka Ohta
--
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your
subscription options, please visit:
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
