Hi, On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 09:31:53PM +0900, Masataka Ohta wrote: > Or, are you saying that just reviewing the current policy situation > requires several years of *agile* reviewing period, after which > several tens of years will be wasted to modify current policy > only after, in the real world, IPv6 will be fully abandoned?
The intent was to have a small group come up with something like a
current policy assessment
- what were the original goals?
- have we succeeded in reaching them?
- if not, is there something that should be done differently?
- is the situation today, 25 years later, significantly different?
- if yes, which goals could be adjusted?
- and then, discuss consequences of these findings, in the larger
group (or maybe come to the conclusion that some of the findings
are just incorrect due to small-group bias)
It turns out that we're all not very agile and have spent too much time
with families and friends instead of working on that document, so there is
nothing to present yet.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg
