Hi Hans Petter!

> I would encourage you to have a look at the article outlining some of the 
> alternatives:
> https://labs.ripe.net/author/athina/protecting-resource-holders-in-distressed-areas/
>  

Yeah, I did read that. I just don’t agree with the arguments. 

> While this might seem like an easy solution on the surface, we cannot help 
> but anticipate situations where this could be abused. For example, we can 
> imagine cases where malicious employees want to prevent an upcoming transfer. 
> Such a solution would also have some administrative challenges, because who 
> is authorised to activate this freeze would need to be specified.

Make it the same person who is authorised to open/close an LIR. The NCC already 
has those contracts. To prevent abuse make it a paper form with signatures over 
registered mail, or whatever the NCC has in place already. I’d put the 
authorisation level at the same one as closing the LIR. 

> Also, we wouldn't be able to adhere to such a requested freeze when companies 
> are bankrupt, liquidated or in case of a legitimate merger and acquisition.

Yeah, I agree there is little you can do about those in any circumstance. 

> In any case, if the period of time for the lock is longer than a couple of 
> days, we would again be very reluctant in implementing this solution without 
> a policy proposal.

Why? An LIR explicitly and voluntarily giving up some rights they have under 
the service agreement is surely a matter between the member and the NCC? The 
policy stays exactly the same. 

> I can assure you that we have taken the measures we believe we can within the 
> existing policy.

I think adding a disclaimer that allows for making transfers null and void 
retroactively is a much bigger risk to all involved than a transfer lock would 
have been. I don’t see how on one hand the NCC can’t verify whether a transfer 
lock is valid, but can verify with absolute certainty that existing paperwork 
is null and void.

To me it feels more like a “let someone else figure this out in court” attitude 
than an actively helpful one.

> Looking forward to hearing what the community thinks here at the list or the 
> meeting next week.

Me too! I’m only a single voice here, and this is a community!

Cheers,
Sander

-- 

To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your 
subscription options, please visit: 
https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/address-policy-wg

Reply via email to