Moin, > I would replace "More specific regulations for additional special > purpose PI assignments may deviate from generic PI assignment > criteria." with: > After <DATE OF PROPOSAL IMPLEMENTATION>, unless otherwise excepted, > an End User may only have one PI assignment. Exceptions to this > include, but are not limited to: > - IXP PI assignments > - Assignments made before the implementation of this protocol and not > yet returned under 7.1.3 > - During renumbering > Other policies may make other exceptions to this general rule.
This, sadly, has a lot of issues (which we (PO+me) partially stumbled through already (multiple times; Sorry again Angela. I really appreciate the time you spend on this.)) while revising the draft document for initial publication. - It now works on an explicit principle making a normative statement, while _also_ allowing generic exceptions (twice, actually). - It makes one specific exception, while missing, e.g., ANYCAST PI, opening the challenge of having to be exhaustive. - It requires a _general_ reevaluation of _all_ assignments prior to the policy becoming into effect; However, a user currently legitimately holding two PIs being totally happy with them should not have any changes forced upon them. Seeking explicit generality here would be, i fear, a source for more confusion and undesired side effects. But i'd be happy to hear other opinions. With best regards, Tobias ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
