Legitimate holders of an IP address prefix assigned or allocated directly by
the RIPE NCC, may be assigned their first AS Number without providing a needs
justification.
There's a lot more to unpack in this sentence than is immediately obvious.
1. Should this not be "allocated or assigned directly by the RIPE NCC"?
What's the intent here? Is it that this should only apply to addressing
resources which ultimately come from the RIPE NCC?
2. is the intent of this policy to be one-easily-obtainable-asn-per-lir,
or one-easily-obtainable-asn-per-organisation, or
one-easily-obtainable-asn-per-organisation-group. I.e. what happens if
you have a group of companies and each company within the group has
their own IP assignment in that group? Is it really the intention to
allow each individual company / LIR to get their own asn before asking
questions?
Nick
-----
To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options,
please visit:
https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/address-policy-wg.ripe.net/
As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings.
More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
