Hey, I am sorry. Due to your comment I spent some time the last days, digging deeper and it turns out the ubsan-message pointed to something else - everything fine with the packed structures. Can't believe I failed to see that.
However, I still don't understand how the SuppressionContext works for the UBSan. Greetings, and thanks, Ilya Am Montag, 9. Mai 2016 11:07:49 UTC+2 schrieb Yuri Gribov: > > On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 10:35 AM, 'Ilya' via address-sanitizer > <address-...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>> wrote: > > > >> Worst case you could wrap problematic code in #ifdef > >> __SANITIZE_UNDEFINED__ and provide dedicated implementation. What's > >> the problem with packed stuff though? > > > > > > Yep, but I'd like to avoid that if possible :) > > Yeah... > > > The packed structures cause "misaligned pointer access". > > Hm, now that sounds as a bug in implementation. Could you file it > (with repro) to GCC BZ? > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > > "address-sanitizer" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an > > email to address-saniti...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "address-sanitizer" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to address-sanitizer+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
