why not report this bug to firefox developers?

On 10/25/06, Arjuna Wijeyekoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

this same problem (of needing nbsp to display empty table cells) occurred
back in the days of Netscape 4.7.
It would suck if they've regressed back to that.
Back then, we had to solve this by having a special ResponseWriter.
The special ResponseWriter would detect if a <TD> was followed by a </TD>
with no intervening non-whitespace character, and
automatically insert an NBSP for netscape.
--arjuna


On 10/24/06, Matt Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon,
>
> I've seen similar issues to this but not yet with Firefox 2.0.
>
> It can be a pretty annoying issue because placing text into something
that
> didn't contain text before may alter its dimensions--even if a specific
> width and height are specified.  When that was the case, I believe we
> worked
> around it by specifying either a "line-height: 1px;" style or possibly
an
> "overflow: hidden;" style.  If the container is larger than a character,
> then there is nothing to worry about.
>
> On a somewhat related note, I'm not sure the DOM structure of the tabs
in
> the navigationPane are even in a format that is very flexible for
> alternative appearances.  I'd be happy to see it restructured to be less
> reliant on tables--possibly even structured so the DOM elements actually
> overlap instead of having graphics to give the illusion of overlapping
> tabs.
>
> Thanks,
> Matt
>
> On 10/24/06, Simon Lessard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hello all,
> >
> > There's a small bug with panelNavigation in tab mode in Firefox 2.0
> (didn't
> > check 1.5) where the tab borders are not rendered. I think it's
because
> > Firefox renders some elements only if they contain something. Since
tabs
> > structure only use some td for background image, it fails. I think I
had
> > the
> > same problem with panelBox and I ended adding a small &nbsp; I might
> have
> > to
> > check.
> >
> > Anyone else has experience with this or comments for the potential
fix?
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > ~ Simon
> >
> >
>
>




--
Arash Rajaeeyan

Reply via email to