ok, I'll change the pom to reflact that.
(I need to add a <pluginsRepo> tag for that, since the m2-incubator repo isn't published to ibiblio) -M On 2/27/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/27/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > I changed the trunk plugins to have 1.0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT as its version. > I changed the trunk core to have 1.0.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT as its version. > > I created also a branch for core to work on a release of > 1.0.0-incubating, which will depend on the "released" 1.0.0-incubating > Plugins (see my earlier mail from today). > > For now, I think the CORE trunk should depend on the *trunk* of the plugins. > Another option would be to "just" depend on the "released" stuff of the plugins. > I am fine with both. I think the CORE trunk should depend on released plugins, until there's a need to rev to snapshots. And, ideally, we'd rarely even do that. We'd put out new releases of the plugin if CORE needed bug fixes urgently. In practice, though, this may be very difficult since the two are somewhat coupled. -- Adam > > In case of we need a "fix" for the plugins we have two possible scenarios: > > CORE depends on a released version: > when trying to release CORE and seeing an issue in the plugins, we > need to release that particular plugin (or all at once), to have the > trunk use the "fixed" patched plugins. > > CORE depends on SNAPSHOT > A fix is quicker, since both artifacts are SNAPSHOTS. > But at the end, to be able to release the CORE, we also need a release > the plugins before that. > > One more, since we, the Apache MyFaces/Trinidad community is in charge > of the PLUGINS and the CORE, there isn't that big issue in depending > on a SNAPSHOT, since it is "our" code. > > What do you guys think? > > Thanks, > Matthias >
-- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
