In all honesty, I haven't had a chance to look at the bits...
I'd want to vote +1, but that seems a bit against-the-spirit...
-- Adam
On 3/9/07, Bernd Bohmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
[X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
and why..............
Matt Cooper wrote:
> [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
> [X] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
>
> On 3/9/07, Bruno Aranda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
>> and why..............
>>
>> On 09/03/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > > [X] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
>> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> > > [ ] +0
>> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>> released,
>> > > and why..............
>> > > ------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > -M
>> >
>>
>
