On 3/14/07, Martin van den Bemt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry people for the late response..
-1.. Missing md5/sha1 checkum for tar.gz and zip (the dist_trin_core).
If they are added and are ok, I am changing to +1..
haha! you got me :-)
Thanks!
Maybe wise to add a text that the binary dist is a complete distribution
including sources (most of
the time you see a separate release for source). No issues here with it all
being in one dist though
yes, I used the pattern from Tobago, so I followed it ;)
Also I rather see incubating-example unpack in it's own directory (no blocker
btw, just personal
preference, since it "messes" up my unpacked dist package).
Another question : Why is commons-logging version 1.0 included and not a later
version ?
well,... lemme check, perhaps dependency of a dependency ?
:)
I'll fix the "md5/sha1" thing tomorrow and upload a new dist.
-Matthias
Mvgr,
Martin
Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I managed to get some release artifacts published to a "stage
> repo". I used my private Apache account for that ([1]). Also there is
> a distribution available at [2].
>
> Please take a look at the "1.0.0-incubating" artifacts and vote if we
> should take these file to ask the Incubator PMC for approval
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 (Binding) for PPMC members only
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Matthias
>
> [1] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/stage_trin_core/
> [2] http://people.apache.org/~matzew/dist_trin_core/
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
