Ah, OK. Well, that makes more sense - I was surprised that we'd picked a different constant. So, let's stay with "percent", of course.
-- Adam On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
looks like the TLD for the convertNumber is wrong. the javax.faces.... uses only "percent" (both RI and MyFaces) So, they should change the doc to not say types... percentage -M On 3/14/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, definitely. We should allow both. > > -- Adam > > > > On 3/13/07, Gabrielle Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > How strange. I think we should allow 'percentage' so that people can > > switch from the spec one without confustion. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gab > > > > On 3/13/2007 7:15 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > the Trinidad NumberConverter, which is an extension of the > > > javax.faces.... NumberConverter doesn't allow type="percentage", which > > > is a value of the spec. > > > > > > To me, "percent" sounds more natural as a value to choose, but > > > shouldn't we at least allow "percentage" as a valid value for the > > > <tr:convertNumber type="..." /> ? > > > > > > Thx, > > > Matthias > > > > > > -- Matthias Wessendorf http://tinyurl.com/fmywh further stuff: blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
