yup
On 3/14/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ah, OK. Well, that makes more sense - I was surprised
that we'd picked a different constant. So, let's stay
with "percent", of course.
-- Adam
On 3/14/07, Matthias Wessendorf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> looks like the TLD for the convertNumber is wrong.
>
> the javax.faces.... uses only "percent" (both RI and MyFaces)
>
> So, they should change the doc to not say types... percentage
>
> -M
>
> On 3/14/07, Adam Winer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, definitely. We should allow both.
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> >
> > On 3/13/07, Gabrielle Crawford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > How strange. I think we should allow 'percentage' so that people can
> > > switch from the spec one without confustion.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Gab
> > >
> > > On 3/13/2007 7:15 AM, Matthias Wessendorf wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > the Trinidad NumberConverter, which is an extension of the
> > > > javax.faces.... NumberConverter doesn't allow type="percentage", which
> > > > is a value of the spec.
> > > >
> > > > To me, "percent" sounds more natural as a value to choose, but
> > > > shouldn't we at least allow "percentage" as a valid value for the
> > > > <tr:convertNumber type="..." /> ?
> > > >
> > > > Thx,
> > > > Matthias
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
