It helps to specify the correct URL!  My apologies for the noise.


On Oct 18, 2006, at 8:34 AM, Robert Morse wrote:

Hello Adam!
I've done what you've suggested, and facelets looks very promising. However, I'm attempting to follow the example as shown in: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ msg01024.html and I've downloaded the referenced at: http:// www.aposso.de/pprTest.zip

No exceptions are thrown, yet what appears on my browser (Safari, Firefox, IE 6) is just the XML file as shown below:

<tr:document title="Facelets">
−
        <tr:form>
<tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1"/>
<tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me" action=""/>
</tr:form>
</tr:document>

The xhtml file actually contains:

<tr:document xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets";
        xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html";
        xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core";
xmlns:tr="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad"; title="Facelets">
        <tr:form>
                <tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1" />
                <tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me"
                        action="" />
        </tr:form>
</tr:document>


My web.xml and faces-config.xml are as described in the pprTest.

I'm confident this is a very simple configuration issue, but for the life of me, I'm just not seeing it.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.



On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Adam Winer wrote:

If this is a new project, I'd also strongly recommend *NOT*
using Tiles.  Look at Facelets, which has far better templating
support (esp. for JSF) than Tiles.

-- Adam


On 10/12/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, you're absolutely right.

regards,

Martin

On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began
> looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk.  I created a small project
> using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces) and > this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance that I > should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad since
> it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk
> components can be added with little effort.  Is this a fair
> assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My apologies for
> the newbie question.
>
>
>


--

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces





Reply via email to