This means that that Facelets didn't find the Trinidad config.
What appserver are you using? -- Adam On 10/18/06, Robert Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Adam! I've done what you've suggested, and facelets looks very promising. However, I'm attempting to follow the example as shown in: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ msg01024.html and I've downloaded the referenced at: http:// www.aposso.de/pprTest.zip No exceptions are thrown, yet what appears on my browser (Safari, Firefox, IE 6) is just the XML file as shown below: <tr:document title="Facelets"> − <tr:form> <tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1"/> <tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me" action=""/> </tr:form> </tr:document> The xhtml file actually contains: <tr:document xmlns:ui="http://java.sun.com/jsf/facelets"; xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"; xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"; xmlns:tr="http://myfaces.apache.org/trinidad"; title="Facelets"> <tr:form> <tr:inputText label="Your name" id="input1" /> <tr:commandButton id="button1" text="press me" action="" /> </tr:form> </tr:document> My web.xml and faces-config.xml are as described in the pprTest. I'm confident this is a very simple configuration issue, but for the life of me, I'm just not seeing it. Any help would be greatly appreciated. On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:14 PM, Adam Winer wrote: > If this is a new project, I'd also strongly recommend *NOT* > using Tiles. Look at Facelets, which has far better templating > support (esp. for JSF) than Tiles. > > -- Adam > > > On 10/12/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Yes, you're absolutely right. >> >> regards, >> >> Martin >> >> On 10/12/06, Robert D. Morse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Coming from the Struts world for the last couple of years, I began >> > looking at MyFaces, Tiles and Tomahawk. I created a small project >> > using these components, when I came across Trinidad (ADF Faces) and >> > this mail list a couple of days ago. It seems at first glance >> that I >> > should migrate this project (and future projects) to Trinidad since >> > it seems to have a greater number of components, and Tomahawk >> > components can be added with little effort. Is this a fair >> > assessment? Any reasons not to take this approach? My >> apologies for >> > the newbie question. >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> -- >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> Courses in English and German >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >
