Would be much simpler to just add each site into an AND statement the day its supposed to get the change.
I don't think it would be a HUGE performance hit, but I can't see that being fast. ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Lai, Jerry [[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2015 9:26 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [adgpo] GPP using Item-level targeting Date Match (Not) to stagger file/registry deployment Ok, say I need to deploy a file or registry to target Computers, but it needs to go out on a staggered schedule - office by office. Release schedule example: 26/06/2015 to IT department 29/06/2015 to Perth office 01/07/2015 to Brisbane office 02/07/2015 to Melbourne office 07/07/2015 to Sydney office Would this Item-level targeting (pictured below) using “Not” Date Match work? Would this slow boot up times with all the added item level targeting to process? [cid:[email protected]] Jerry Lai Desktop Systems Engineer Herbert Smith Freehills T +61 3 9288 1780 M +61 4198 9461 F +61 3 9288 1567 www.herbertsmithfreehills.com<http://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/> linkedin.com/in/JerryLai<https://au.linkedin.com/in/jerryvlai> Herbert Smith Freehills LLP and its subsidiaries and Herbert Smith Freehills, an Australian Partnership, are separate member firms of the international legal practice known as Herbert Smith Freehills. This message is confidential and may be covered by legal professional privilege. If you are not the intended recipient you must not disclose or use the information contained in it. If you have received this email in error please notify us immediately by return email or by calling our main switchboard on +612 9225 5000 and delete the email. Further information is available from www.herbertsmithfreehills.com<http://www.herbertsmithfreehills.com/>.
