You should probably also consider the Dell 2405FPW LCD monitor. At $1,200 it's still more expensive than a CRT with similar resolution, and the 12ms response time is inferior to what you get from most CRTs, However, it has a respectable 1920x1200 resolution and, as you probably know, there is no flicker on LCDs. -----Original Message----- From: Radu Carlan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 24 March 2005 6:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: RE: [AP] CRT vs LCD Monitor
Michelle, The NEC FP2141SB and Mitsubishi Diamond Pro 2070SB can both do 1600x1200 @ 109Hz. They can also do 1920x1440 @ 92Hz, which is actually bloody impressive. I mean, that's a lot of pixels to refresh every hundredth of a second ... You should be able to find them for around $600-700 USD. Radu _____ From: Michelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 24 March 2005 8:29 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AP] CRT vs LCD Monitor Hi Rob, Unfortunately, I do have sensitive eyes and I do wear contact lens which has caused additional sensitivity. I've been playing around with the different refresh rates which is why I've landed at 100 - 120 hz is what I can take. The monitor I just bought isn't going to work for me - and it's giving me headaches if I sit in front of it for any length of time :-( Thanks again! Michelle [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
