Thanks for the info. I'm using Sony FX 1000's. If this is an H264 format then I'm thinking it is pretty good and I shouldn't expect a noticable reduction of quality compared to capturing HDV. Why did Adobe use this when it uses HDV to capture from tape?
--- In [email protected], BEDFORD NEIL <barrymung@...> wrote: > > Hi Gerald, > > The .M2T or .MTS or even .MT2S extensions are all part of the AVCHD 'family' > (if you can call them that) of HD Blu-Ray video, using H.264 compression. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MPEG_transport_stream > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AVCHD > > Your HDV is actually the lossy MPEG2/H.262 4.2.0 compression system, more > here: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HDV > > That should help explain things and make it more understandable. > > Just tell us what camera it is and someone should be able to help more :-) > > Cheers, > > Neil. > > On 2 August 2011 18:20, Gerald <mail@...> wrote: > > > ** > > > > > > Why does OnLocation use .m2t file format instead of HDV? Is there any > > problem with this? I can see that PP is happy with this file format, but > > isn't is a compressed mpeg based format? > > > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
