At 8-9-2011 16:11, gl wrote:
> > I was thinking earlier today about how deejays in the past would
>create the phased audio effect by using two identicial vinyl records on
>two turntables and first sync them and then get them out of sync a tiny
>little bit on purpose which wasn't difficult to do of course, it was
>harder to keep them in sync :-)
>
>Yes, that's exactly the same principle. In audio that effect is called
>flanging, it was actually first done with two tape machines
>(apparently), including by the Beatles.
Yes that's right, it's called flanging, not phasing. Later they
invented the electronic flanger effect box, Jimi Hendrix was probably
one of the first musicians using it (he was famous for buying
everything that came out especially effect boxes).
> > I used the AF101 (AF100) for a while, it has genlock, but I didn't
>like the electronic noise and the blurry image, I find the image quality
>of the GH2 better. So the decision to the sell the AF101 again wasn't
>difficult to make :-). So I wouldn't recommend it to you either. Yes it
>has genlock but it's also about 6 times as expensive as the GH2 and
>image quality is worse as the GH2.
>
>Good to know. Genlock is kinda needed for high-end 3D, but the
>workaround (powering both cameras up simultaneously) works reasonably
>well for short takes, as long as you're lucky and your two bodies don't
>drift apart too fast.
I'm curious about the new Sony 35mm camcorders, some are cheap and
may have genlocks and may have better image quality than the AF101. I
haven't had any time to lookup samples on Vimeo etc.
> > Is the GH2 the only "DSLR" cam you used so far?
>
>Yep. Before I had a Canon HV20 camcorder.
>
> > I love the image of the 7D but the moire effect can be problematic
>(depending on what you do) and it has the annoying 12 minute clip
>duration limit.
>
>I think you can't beat the GH2 for video in its class, even more so now
>with the high-bitrate hacks. And more hack work is being done to
>improve other areas (eg. the 'film modes', hopefully reducing in-cam
>sharpening further etc).
I haven't tried any of the hacks yet, I read about it a little on
DVXuser forum, it's a very interesting development.
>Plus you get a very small & lightweight body.
Yes that was my third reason for prefering the GH2 over the AF101.
>I use Panny's two ultra-tiny pancake primes (14mm & 20mm), so my setup
>is really small & lightweight.
I use these two lenses too and I really like them. Very small and
light, good image quality, good bokeh, and the AF works very well.
I've also used the GH1 and GH2 with the Tokina 11-16 and 25mm and
50mm Zeiss primes (using a Nikon/MFT adapter) and image quality
wasn't better, the Zeiss lenses are very heavy and having to control
focus and aperture using the manual rings all the time didn't make
things easier either. I hope Panasonic will come with an 11mm pancake soon.
Rieni
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
