For modern action cinema, the higher frame rates will be good, yes. The technique is available so it should be stupid not to use it, a lot of the rendered clarity in computer generated special effects is trashed again by usage of lower frame rates.
I love (and prefer) old cinema though and see the 24fps blur as a wonderful part of that. That's also what people try to achieve when aiming for "the cinema look". But this look is overrated and used by people for too many things. And in the end, "cinema look" doesn't consist of a certain frame rate alone, it also consists of proper color correction. Rieni At 1-12-2011 20:39, Lee Menningen wrote: > > >Yes, resolution matters, and yes, the article agrees WHAT you shoot matters. >A 1920x1080 wouldn't do as well on a 30 foot screen as 4K regardless of >frame rate (and the 60 fps you're shooting at is not shown at that rate to >movie audiences). > >The article claimed that while higher frame rates wouldn't help "love >stories or crime dramas, which are story driven", it is appropriate for a >"visual effects-driven movie not dependent on star talent, and is attractive >to a very wide audience demographic. I hate the blurriness of cameras >panning at 24fps, don't you? > >"When you spend $300 million on a blockbuster, the production value isn't >getting to the audiences' eyes. It's limited by the medium itself. It >doesn't matter what you pay the cast. If you simply increase frame rate, you >can tremendously increase audience impact at almost no cost. That's why >Peter Jackson is shooting The Hobbit at 48 fps and James Cameron has stated >his plans to shoot Avatar 2 and 3 at 60 fps." Full article here ><<http://magazine.creativecow.net/article/douglas-trumbull-sees-a-better-film>http://magazine.creativecow.net/article/douglas-trumbull-sees-a-better-film >going-future> . > >Lee > >From: ><mailto:Adobe-Premiere%40yahoogroups.com>[email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] >On Behalf Of Rieni >Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2011 3:05 PM >To: <mailto:Adobe-Premiere%40yahoogroups.com>[email protected] >Subject: Re: [AP] 120fps For What It's Worth > > >I got a "spam" today for the new Sony F65 which has 4K resolution. >Before we know it we'll be shooting and editing in 4K @ 120fps even >though the 60fps I've been shooting with with the Panasonic AF100 is >good enough already. It also depends on WHAT you shoot of course, and >what for. I think for most niches the higher 4K resolution will fill >a bigger gap than higher frame rates. > >Rieni [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Adobe-Premiere/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
