With the latest Atape driver 5.4.4.0 ? Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Am: 30.01.2001 16:46 GMT Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kopie: (Blindkopie: Matthew Muldoon/MAINSTOR/Niedernberg/mus/DE) Thema: Re: Antwort: Re: Problems after 4.1 Upgrade and Resolutions We are running 4.1.2. At 05:41 PM 1/30/01 +0100, you wrote: >Are you using 4.1.0 or 4.1.2? > > > > >Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Am: 30.01.2001 16:22 GMT > > >Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Kopie: (Blindkopie: Matthew Muldoon/MAINSTOR/Niedernberg/mus/DE) >Thema: Re: Problems after 4.1 Upgrade and Resolutions > > > > >We are running D25D. This level of microcode ran fine prior to going to >TSM 4.1. We had never had an IO error before then. Now we receive the >errors on both our tape drives. > >At 08:43 AM 1/30/01 -0600, you wrote: > >Diane, > > > >What level of microcode are you currently running on your 3590 tape >drives. > >We are running 3590E1A tape drives with a microcode level of D22E. We >have > >been on this level of code for quite some time with no errors. Our 3590's > >are also house within a 3494. > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Diana Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 8:15 AM > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >Subject: Problems after 4.1 Upgrade and Resolutions > > > > > >I had posted some questions last month regarding problems we encountered > >after our upgrade to TSM 4.1 and thought I would pass along what we > >found. We are using AIX 4.3, 3590E's and a 3494. > > > >When issuing the dsmadmc command we received "ANS1033E An invalid TCP/IP > >host name was specified". Resolution was to edit > >/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys and add a line for TCPServeraddress > >which stated the tsm server name in full. This was apparently not > >necessary under 3.1. > > > >We could not label K tapes. We had problems with this under 3.1, but it > >turned out IBM needed to flick a switch on the drives. We upgraded the > >same day. We would receive "ANR8750E Volume is incompatible with >specified > >device type". IBM had defined the volume range for the K tapes as "K > >extended" and should have been defined as just "K". > > > >We also started receiving IO errors on our 3590 tape drives. This still > >persists today, but a microcode fix for the problem is in test at IBM and > >is suppose to be released by the end of the month (Hopefully!). The error > >we are receiving is "ANR8302E I/O error on drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1) > >(OP=WRITE, CC=0, KEY=0B, ASC=44, ASCQ=00".