Yes, our Atape driver is at 5.4.4.0. We initially went from 5.0.2.0 to
5.4.2.0 and saw the problem there also.
At 05:51 PM 1/30/01 +0100, you wrote:
>With the latest Atape driver 5.4.4.0 ?
>
>
>
>Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Am: 30.01.2001 16:46 GMT
>
>
>Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Kopie: (Blindkopie: Matthew Muldoon/MAINSTOR/Niedernberg/mus/DE)
>Thema: Re: Antwort: Re: Problems after 4.1 Upgrade and Resolutions
>
>
>
>
>We are running 4.1.2.
>
>At 05:41 PM 1/30/01 +0100, you wrote:
> >Are you using 4.1.0 or 4.1.2?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >Von: Diana Noble <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Am: 30.01.2001 16:22 GMT
> >
> >
> >Bitte antworten an "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Kopie: (Blindkopie: Matthew Muldoon/MAINSTOR/Niedernberg/mus/DE)
> >Thema: Re: Problems after 4.1 Upgrade and Resolutions
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >We are running D25D. This level of microcode ran fine prior to going to
> >TSM 4.1. We had never had an IO error before then. Now we receive the
> >errors on both our tape drives.
> >
> >At 08:43 AM 1/30/01 -0600, you wrote:
> > >Diane,
> > >
> > >What level of microcode are you currently running on your 3590 tape
> >drives.
> > >We are running 3590E1A tape drives with a microcode level of D22E. We
> >have
> > >been on this level of code for quite some time with no errors. Our
>3590's
> > >are also house within a 3494.
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Diana Noble [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > >Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 8:15 AM
> > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Subject: Problems after 4.1 Upgrade and Resolutions
> > >
> > >
> > >I had posted some questions last month regarding problems we encountered
> > >after our upgrade to TSM 4.1 and thought I would pass along what we
> > >found. We are using AIX 4.3, 3590E's and a 3494.
> > >
> > >When issuing the dsmadmc command we received "ANS1033E An invalid TCP/IP
> > >host name was specified". Resolution was to edit
> > >/usr/tivoli/tsm/client/ba/bin/dsm.sys and add a line for
>TCPServeraddress
> > >which stated the tsm server name in full. This was apparently not
> > >necessary under 3.1.
> > >
> > >We could not label K tapes. We had problems with this under 3.1, but it
> > >turned out IBM needed to flick a switch on the drives. We upgraded the
> > >same day. We would receive "ANR8750E Volume is incompatible with
> >specified
> > >device type". IBM had defined the volume range for the K tapes as "K
> > >extended" and should have been defined as just "K".
> > >
> > >We also started receiving IO errors on our 3590 tape drives. This still
> > >persists today, but a microcode fix for the problem is in test at IBM
>and
> > >is suppose to be released by the end of the month (Hopefully!). The
>error
> > >we are receiving is "ANR8302E I/O error on drive RMT1 (/dev/rmt1)
> > >(OP=WRITE, CC=0, KEY=0B, ASC=44, ASCQ=00".
