Have you tried using "tapeutil" to do inventory? I think it just reads barcode from
internal memory of library. I have TSM 3.7.4.0 with 3575-L32. Always use audit
library 3575lib1 checklabel=barcode as this only takes about 20 seconds. Reading
tapes would take a looong time. Do not have problems except rarely - occaisional
barcode problem with a tape or two, or other onesy twosy problems.
I always examine actlog very carefully for an indication of problem, it generally
points me in right direction.
David B. Longo
System Administrator
Health First, Inc.
3300 Fiske Blvd.
Rockledge, FL 32955-4305
PH 321.434.5536
Pager 321.634.8230
Fax: 321.434.5525
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/10/01 01:56PM >>>
I have been at my present job for a year and the audit library command
fails EVERY time when it tries to read the labels. It will read some and
then, I suspect it can't keep up and fails in exactly the manner you noted.
I am on a 3575L32 at 3.7.3.6. I spoke with Tivoli about it and they claimed
I needed to upgrade to a higher code level. Haven't gotten around to doing
it; I just have the library read the barcode labels. It actually reads them
when it initializes and stores the info which is read by TSM when the
command is issued.
George Lesho
Marc Levitan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 07/10/2001 10:25:51
AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Fax to:
Subject: Library Audit Unsuccessful
I've had this happen in the past but this time is different.
I do NOT receive any errors except the following:
ANR8460E AUDIT LIBRARY process for library TEKWOLF failed.
ANR0985I Process 25 for AUDIT LIBRARY running in the
BACKGROUND completed with completion state FAILURE
at
10:09:00.
I printed a q libv list and physically compared it to the Library
inventory, and it matches perfect.
If i run a "audit library tekwolf checklabel=barcode" it completes
successfully. It's when the audit actually mounts the volumes to check the
labels that it fails.
any ideas?
Thanks,
Marc Levitan
"MMS <health-first.org>" made the following
annotations on 07/10/01 14:47:54
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This message is for the named person's use only. It may contain confidential,
proprietary, or legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is
waived or lost by any mistransmission. If you receive this message in error, please
immediately delete it and all copies of it from your system, destroy any hard copies
of it, and notify the sender. You must not, directly or indirectly, use, disclose,
distribute, print, or copy any part of this message if you are not the intended
recipient. Health First reserves the right to monitor all e-mail communications
through its networks. Any views or opinions expressed in this message are solely
those of the individual sender, except (1) where the message states such views or
opinions are on behalf of a particular entity; and (2) the sender is authorized by
the entity to give such views or opinions.
==============================================================================
