>> On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 12:16:27 -0400, "Johnson, Milton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> said:
> Why a VTL? With us we found that when we out grew our physical > library we would have to have to buy over 30 physical drives in > order to be able to do backups, restores, cut off-site tapes and > reclaim on/off site tapes in the time allowed. That amounted to > some serious money, more than our VTL costs. I'm interested in the details on this. The VTL is disk-only, or is it tape backed? I'm confused about how you need fewer tape-head-hours when you virtualize processes. - Allen S. Rout
