Must not have been clear. Sorry about that. For every 1 proc or core of Power you would need 4 or more of x86 (even at their best level). I have seen the numbers from Intel comparing Newer x86 processors to Power6 and they are just below the Power 6 (using 2x's the number of cores). The problem is, You can get Power7 cheaper than Power6, and get twice the performance. So, the cost might be cheaper per proc on x86, but the performance isn't half as good. So, you wind up having to buy 4 times the number of processors, which means you pay more in the long run (requires more servers, LAN ports, Electrical Power, cooling, more complex management, etc. etc.). The advantages with Power are manifold, especially with Power7.
There are still some who think that you can use cheap intel hardware and get the same or better price/performance of a current Power box, but what you get is unreliable hardware. I've been a Linux guy for a long time, and for lighter loads (web servers, file servers, app servers and small to midrange DB servers) Linux is a much cheaper option. However, for heavy lifting, (large Oracle or DB2 dbs, something like TSM, etc.) AIX is still the better option. I can run a single TSM instance on AIX/Power long after Intel boxes have had to complicate their lives with multiple TSM servers and Library managers, etc. My challenge to folks is to price it out for yourselves. We have purchased smaller Power7 Servers for around 12K (gets us 8 cores of Power7, 6 HBAs or 3 dual port HBAs, 16GB RAM, etc). An equally powered Intel box (with half the performance) is about 15K. See Ya' Howard Coles Jr. John 3:16! -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Shawn Drew Sent: Friday, October 07, 2011 10:21 AM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86... I think he was looking for Power vs x86 in price/performance. I.E If you spend 50K on Power systems and 50K on x86 systems. which could produce more I/O throughput. (If not, that's what I'd like to hear an update on) From what I remember from previous discussions, x86/linux would come out on top for pure price/performance, but managing many x86 systems vs a single/fewer Power systems certainly has some value. I'm sure there are many other intangibles when it comes to value. Regards, Shawn ________________________________________________ Shawn Drew Internet howard.co...@ardenthealth.com Sent by: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU 10/07/2011 09:44 AM Please respond to ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU To ADSM-L cc Subject Re: [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86... Yes, it is. There are very few things I would say this about, but this is one of 'em. For a RHEL box to match the performance capabilities it would have to be installed on Power as well (which it can be). I think the evidence I've seen both in experience and raw numbers has shown the power boxes can sustain higher levels of throughput and performance. Because to get an x86 box to perform at those levels you would have to spend just as much, buying one really powerful x86 box, or spreading it across multiple boxes. All that said, if we didn't have a good AIX guy here, I'd go RHEL on multiple boxes, or on a really powerful x86 box. I can admin AIX, but I'm much more comfortable on Linux. So, as someone else said, it all depends on what you're good at. See Ya' Howard Coles Jr. John 3:16! -----Original Message----- From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Allen S. Rout Sent: Thursday, October 06, 2011 3:46 PM To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU Subject: [ADSM-L] Check signals on Power vs. x86... I'm looking around for an update on my expectations that power hardware and AIX is more performant per memory/CPU/IO than x86 and RHEL. I know this topic comes up from time to time; I don't think I've seen it rehashed particularly recently. I'm an advocate of AIX for this, but I wanted to check signals and experiences, again. - Allen S. Rout DISCLAIMER: This communication, along with any documents, files or attachments, is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of any information contained in or attached to this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original communication and its attachments without reading, printing or saving in any manner. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. This message and any attachments (the "message") is intended solely for the addressees and is confidential. If you receive this message in error, please delete it and immediately notify the sender. Any use not in accord with its purpose, any dissemination or disclosure, either whole or partial, is prohibited except formal approval. The internet can not guarantee the integrity of this message. BNP PARIBAS (and its subsidiaries) shall (will) not therefore be liable for the message if modified. Please note that certain functions and services for BNP Paribas may be performed by BNP Paribas RCC, Inc. DISCLAIMER: This communication, along with any documents, files or attachments, is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of any information contained in or attached to this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and destroy the original communication and its attachments without reading, printing or saving in any manner. Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.