Can you say some more about this Shawn? Or give a reference? I'm curious why 1.x isn't able to use the large memory...
Thanks! -Roy -----Original Message----- From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Wildermuth Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:38 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] 64bit Windows XP vs 32 bit In 1.x he's right, in 2.0 you should be able to use the large memory. It's JIT'd to 64bit code, but not sure whether AMD vs. Intel 64bit would make a difference. Thanks, Shawn Wildermuth http://adoguy.com C# MVP, MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker ->-----Original Message----- ->From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Marlow ->Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 4:35 PM ->To: [email protected] ->Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] 64bit Windows XP vs 32 bit -> ->Hi Gurus, -> ->I am using a 3rd party class library developed / based on the .net ->runtime. ->Would it automagically utilize large memory model? The vendor tech ->support dude claims it would run under "32 bit compatability mode" and ->thus be limited to 4GB of memory. ->This seems odd as one of the promises of .net was ability to run on ->various processors without needing to recompile. ->Comments? -> ->- Mark -> ->=================================== ->This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com -> ->View archives and manage your subscription(s) at ->http://discuss.develop.com 09/06/2005 04:37:16 PM =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
