Hrm. Confusing. I would have thought that the JIT compilers would be platform specific, but the .net assemblies put out by say, csc.exe, would not be. So there'd be a 32-bit version of the 1.1 framework (which would include just a 32-bit JIT compiler, and any ngen'ed type code would all be 32-bit) and a different, 64-bit version (which would only include a 64-bit JIT, etc.).
<light goes on> So you're saying there's no 64-bit version of the 1.x framework? -----Original Message----- From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Wildermuth Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:54 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] 64bit Windows XP vs 32 bit >From what I understand, there are two JIT'ers in 2.0, one for 64bit and one for 32 bit. IN 1.x, there was never a 64 JIT'er created, and I suspect never will be. Good thing in 2.0 is that write your code once and if it has a 64 bit JIT, it will run in 64 bit...write-once, run-many? Wait, don't tell anyone I said that ;) Thanks, Shawn Wildermuth http://adoguy.com C# MVP, MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker ->-----Original Message----- ->From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pardee, Roy ->Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 4:45 PM ->To: [email protected] ->Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] 64bit Windows XP vs 32 bit -> ->Can you say some more about this Shawn? Or give a reference? -> I'm curious why 1.x isn't able to use the large memory... -> ->Thanks! -> ->-Roy -> ->-----Original Message----- ->From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. ->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn ->Wildermuth ->Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 1:38 PM ->To: [email protected] ->Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] 64bit Windows XP vs 32 bit -> ->In 1.x he's right, in 2.0 you should be able to use the large memory. ->It's JIT'd to 64bit code, but not sure whether AMD vs. Intel 64bit ->would make a difference. -> ->Thanks, -> ->Shawn Wildermuth ->http://adoguy.com ->C# MVP, MCSD.NET, Author and Speaker -> ->->-----Original Message----- ->->From: Unmoderated discussion of advanced .NET topics. ->->[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ->Mark Marlow ->->Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 4:35 PM ->->To: [email protected] ->->Subject: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] 64bit Windows XP vs 32 bit ->-> ->->Hi Gurus, ->-> ->->I am using a 3rd party class library developed / based on the .net ->->runtime. ->->Would it automagically utilize large memory model? The vendor tech ->->support dude claims it would run under "32 bit ->compatability mode" and -> ->->thus be limited to 4GB of memory. ->->This seems odd as one of the promises of .net was ability to run on ->->various processors without needing to recompile. ->->Comments? ->-> ->->- Mark ->-> ->->=================================== ->->This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com ->-> ->->View archives and manage your subscription(s) at ->->http://discuss.develop.com ->09/06/2005 04:37:16 PM -> ->=================================== ->This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com -> ->View archives and manage your subscription(s) at ->http://discuss.develop.com -> ->=================================== ->This list is hosted by DevelopMentor. http://www.develop.com -> ->View archives and manage your subscription(s) at ->http://discuss.develop.com 09/06/2005 04:49:14 PM =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
