Of course :)
On 4/19/06, Eric Means <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, there are really two aspects of presentation. > > There's layout, which defines /how the page looks/, and then there's > interaction, which defines what happens when you perform actions (such as > clicks) on objects in the layout. > > You can mix the two, but I find that having the two separate makes it easier > to manage (and keeps everything from looking like PHP or ASP Classic). > Layout goes in the .as[pcah]x, Interaction in the .as[pcah]x.cs. > > Business logic goes in class assemblies. > > On 4/19/06, Ernst Kuschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > "The whole idea is to not have presentation code interspersed with > > programming logic." > > > > In fact, it seems that you might be doing just that... your > > code-behind should contain only presentation logic also! ;o) > > Move your real logic to yet seperate assemblies. > > > > On 4/19/06, Paul Cowan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anyway, I still think it is a very messy style and is exactly what code > > behind was created for. > > > The whole idea is to not have presentation code interspersed with > > programming logic. > > > I used to be an ASP developer and it was not a good way of doing > > things.I cannot be convinced that inline script is a good thing. I know > > in some cases it is good for file location using ResolveUrl but in most it > > is a heinous practice and in my opinion a hack. > > > Even with things like <%# ((Customer)Container.DataItem).CustomerName %> > > when used in a repeater control is bad because behind the scenes it uses > > reflection. > > > > > > It is much better to subscribe to the ItemDataBound event and do it in > > an actual code file. > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 14:34:50 -0400> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: [ADVANCED-DOTNET] VS ASP.NET 2005> To: > > [email protected]> > > No I don't mean debug it, I mean > > that it will not do any type> > checking etc.> > If I have the inline on an > > .aspx page> >> > <%= NoSuchMethod("Garbage") %>> >> > and I compile then the > > compiler will not throw an error.> > I rest my case, try it if you do not > > believe me.> > The compiler does check it. It's just that you're using the > > ASP.NET> compiler, which is invoked upon first access to the page.> > Now > > in ASP.NET 2.0 you can precompile your ASPX pages prior to deployment,> > > which sounds like what you're looking for.> > -Brock> > > http://staff.develop.com/ballen> > ===================================> > > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com> > View > > archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com > > > =================================== > > > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com > > > > > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > > http://discuss.develop.com > > > > > > > > > -- > > Ernst Kuschke > > MVP - C# > > http://dotnet.org.za/ernst > > > > =================================== > > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com > > > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at > > http://discuss.develop.com > > > > > > -- > Eric Means > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.randomtree.org/eric/ > > =================================== > This list is hosted by DevelopMentor(r) http://www.develop.com > > View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com > -- Ernst Kuschke MVP - C# http://dotnet.org.za/ernst =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
