Of course as soon as I start this I realise that the problem has shifted from testing a result to setting the non default value. I'm unlikely to do that bit and forget to do the rest, so I guess there's nothing for it but to be careful.
Thanks David. On Mon, 29 Oct 2007 06:25:56 -0600, Steve Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Use reflection to compare property values. If you have a mismatch, you need >to fix your clone method. > > >-- >Steve Johnson > >On 10/29/07, David Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I have some classes where I provide a Clone() method to provide a deep >> copy of an instance, and would like to test that I haven't added a member >> to the class without also adding it to Clone(). >> >> To test Clone() I set a non-default value for the member, then check that >> the cloned copy has that value. However if I forget to add it to Clone (), >> I'll probably also forget to add it to the test. >> >> Does anyone have a way to do this, other than the obvious one of being >> more disciplined? >> >> Thanks >> David. =================================== This list is hosted by DevelopMentor® http://www.develop.com View archives and manage your subscription(s) at http://discuss.develop.com
