On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Uros Nedic<urosn at live.com> wrote:
> > We also need WebKit to be ported on OpenSolaris, especially > since further versions of GNOME will depend on it. > Belenix has a version of Webkit, based partly on the work done by the JDS team. > Uros > > > ---------------------------------------- >> Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 16:25:20 -0700 >> From: brandon.barker at gmail.com >> To: advocacy-discuss at opensolaris.org >> Subject: Re: [advocacy-discuss] Google Chrome @ OpenSolaris >> >> A solaris port will probably be easier than the initial linux port, and I >> think this will especially be true once more work has been done on the linux >> port. >> >> I've heard the chrome developers were complaining about the difficulty in >> implementing sandboxing in chrome on linux due to the various security >> models: AppArmor, SELinux, default, etc. >> -- >> This message posted from opensolaris.org >> _______________________________________________ >> advocacy-discuss mailing list >> advocacy-discuss at opensolaris.org >> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy-discuss > > _________________________________________________________________ > Share your memories online with anyone you want. > http://www.microsoft.com/middleeast/windows/windowslive/products/photos-share.aspx?tab=1 > _______________________________________________ > advocacy-discuss mailing list > advocacy-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/advocacy-discuss >
